Java and Rust by Yishai Galatzer

Java and Rust compared: Memory safety, performance, and concurrency evaluated in a systems development context, with insights from the author's experience.

Key takeaways

Java and Rust can be competitive in terms of performance, but Rust’s focus on memory safety and performance makes it a more promising choice for modern systems development.
Java’s garbage collector can be a performance bottleneck, but Rust’s ownership system helps avoid memory allocation and deallocation, leading to better performance.
Rust’s async programming model using Tokyo is more efficient than Java’s async programming model using Micronaut.
Java’s runtime environment can be complex and error-prone, leading to issues with memory management and performance.
Rust’s compile-time evaluation and lack of runtime overhead make it a more efficient choice for systems programming.
Optimizing Java applications can be 外andupyterentious, whereas Rust’s ownership system provides a simple and predictable way to manage memory.
The author’s experience with Java and Rust demonstrates that Rust can be a viable alternative to Java for systems development.
Rust’s support for atomic operations and concurrency makes it suitable for building high-performance, concurrent systems.
The Java ecosystem has many libraries and frameworks, but Rust’s ecosystem is growing and provides a unique set of tools and libraries for building systems software.
The author suggests that Rust’s performance benefits are not just due to the language itself, but also due to its ecosystem and tooling.
The presentation does not provide a comprehensive comparison of Java and Rust, but rather highlights some of the strengths and weaknesses of each language.

Java and Rust by Yishai Galatzer

More talks