Using clinical science to effectively tackle code review anxiety (LeadDev)

Learn how to tackle code review anxiety using clinical science interventions. Discover evidence-based strategies to build confidence, challenge biases, and create healthier teams.

Key takeaways

Code review anxiety is normal and can affect developers of any experience level - it’s not just a junior developer issue
The condition is driven by cognitive biases including catastrophizing, mind reading, and dichotomous thinking
Key factors that increase anxiety include:
- Low anxiety self-efficacy (belief in ability to handle anxiety)
- Cost bias (overestimating negative outcomes)
- High probability bias (overestimating likelihood of bad things happening)
Avoidance makes anxiety worse long-term and prevents accessing benefits of code reviews
Science-driven interventions were successful in:
- Reducing anxiety levels
- Increasing self-efficacy
- Improving self-compassion
- Decreasing avoidance behaviors
Recommended approach to manage anxiety:
- Identify thinking traps and cognitive biases
- Challenge biased thoughts with rational responses
- Reduce physiological arousal
- Develop realistic and self-compassionate views
Talking about code review anxiety with teams helps normalize the experience
Single-session cognitive behavioral workshops can effectively address the issue
The experience remains invisible when not discussed, making people feel alone
A self-guided workbook approach allows developers to work through anxiety management at their own pace

Using clinical science to effectively tackle code review anxiety (LeadDev)

More talks