Is GenAI All You Need to Classify Text? Some Learnings from the Trenches

Learn why specialized models outperform GenAI for text classification, with insights on multilingual support, optimization techniques, and practical tradeoffs from real-world usage.

Key takeaways
  • Generative AI/LLMs perform poorly for text classification tasks compared to specialized models, showing a significant accuracy drop (~16%) and much higher computational costs

  • Smaller specialized models can be 1000x smaller than LLMs while being faster, more cost-effective, and more environmentally friendly

  • Using frozen pre-trained multilingual language models (sentence transformers) with a simple classifier layer provides good results across multiple languages due to language alignment in the latent space

  • Model optimization techniques like graph optimization and quantization can reduce response times by 2-3x and significantly decrease memory consumption

  • LLMs can still be useful for:

    • Generating training data when labels are scarce
    • Bootstrapping new categories
    • Handling new languages without existing training data
  • For multilingual systems, using language-aligned embeddings allows training on one language while maintaining performance across others

  • Response time optimization is crucial for user experience - the new optimized model was 3x faster than legacy system and 100-1000x faster than using Palm2

  • Environmental and cost considerations strongly favor specialized models over LLMs for narrow classification tasks

  • Maintaining separate monolingual pipelines is complex and inefficient compared to a single multilingual model

  • Post-processing and manual curation of LLM outputs is often necessary due to hallucination issues