How to Get the Most Out of the Python Decompilers Uncompyle6 and Decompyle3 - How to Write and Read

Explore Python decompilation tools Uncompyle6 and Decompyle3, including bytecode analysis, version compatibility, and best practices for malware analysis and source recovery.

Key takeaways
  • Python decompilers work differently from general-purpose decompilers like IDA Pro or Ghidra, as they are specifically designed for high-level bytecode rather than machine code

  • High-level bytecode decompilation is attractive for malware analysis because bytecode is portable, compact, and resistant to standard analysis tools

  • The decompilation process involves multiple phases:

    • Disassembly of bytecode into instructions
    • Tokenization of the disassembly
    • Parsing tokens into a parse tree
    • Converting parse tree to abstract syntax tree
    • Generating source code from the AST
  • Python bytecode varies significantly between versions, making decompilation increasingly difficult with each new Python release

  • Uncompyle6 and Decompyle3 use grammar-based approaches to reconstruct source code, which helps handle nested control flow structures effectively

  • Control flow in Python bytecode decompilation is tied to specific Python versions and requires understanding concepts like dominator regions and basic blocks

  • Comments and formatting from original source code don’t appear in bytecode, making perfect reconstruction impossible

  • Current limitations include:

    • Version-specific compatibility
    • Difficulty handling newer Python versions
    • Increasing complexity of Python bytecode
    • Limited availability of tools for newer versions
  • Grammar-based decompilation produces more accurate results compared to pattern-matching approaches used by some other decompilers

  • Understanding bytecode structure and decompilation principles is crucial for analyzing malware written in Python, especially when source code is unavailable