We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Safety Engineering: A Journey • Brad Tonkes • YOW! 2018
Learn how safety engineering prevents catastrophic failures through independent controls, strong culture, and systematic training. Key lessons and benefits explored.
-
Safety engineering is distinct from reliability and resilience engineering - it focuses on managing unexpected situations and preventing catastrophic failures
-
Controls should be:
- Independent from primary systems
- Simple in design and implementation
- Orthogonal (not duplicating primary functionality)
- Minimal in number to avoid complexity
- Validated through testing and monitoring
-
Successful safety programs require:
- Clear top-down directives and management support
- Whole organization involvement, not just dedicated teams
- Systematic training on risks and controls
- Regular review and reporting of KPIs
- Cultural shift from “speed to market” to “safety first”
-
Common challenges in implementing safety controls:
- Developer resistance and lack of motivation
- Alert fatigue from false positives
- Difficulty maintaining focus when controls are rarely used
- Complexity in designing for unknown scenarios
- Negative expected value (like insurance)
-
Key lessons learned:
- Hubris is the enemy of safety
- Put people and culture before technology
- Controls need continuous refinement and patience
- False positives need usability improvements
- Controls require eternal vigilance even when not activated
-
Benefits beyond catastrophic prevention:
- Improved incident detection and response
- Better handling of everyday incidents
- Enhanced reliability and resilience
- More systematic approach to risk management
- Stronger organizational accountability